Biofuels have been around as long as cars have.

A biofuel is a fuel that contains energy from geologically recent carbon fixation. These fuels are produced from living organisms.

Generating Electricity from Wing Waves.

Wind turbines, like windmills, are mounted on a tower to capture the most energy. At 100 feet (30 meters) or more aboveground, they can take advantage of the faster and less turbulent wind.

Producing electricity from solar energy.

Solar energy is a free, inexhaustible resource, yet harnessing it is a relatively new idea. The ability to use solar power for heat was the first discovery.

Turbines catch the wind's energy with their propeller-like blades.

A blade acts much like an airplane wing. When the wind blows, a pocket of low-pressure air forms on the downwind side of the blade.

Solar energy may have had great potential

Solar technology advanced to roughly its present design in 1908 when William J. Bailey of the Carnegie Steel Company invented a collector with an insulated box and copper coils.

We have been harnessing the wind's energy for hundreds of years.

For utility-scale sources of wind energy, a large number of wind turbines are usually built close together to form awind plant.

Biofuels are produced from living organisms.

In order to be considered a biofuel the fuel must contain over 80 percent renewable materials.

Geothermal energy is the heat from the Earth.

Resources of geothermal energy range from the shallow ground to hot water and hot rock found a few miles beneath the Earth's surface, and down even deeper to the extremely high temperatures of molten rock called magma.

Geothermal heat pumps can tap into this resource to heat and cool buildings.

A geothermal heat pump system consists of a heat pump, an air delivery system (ductwork), and a heat exchanger-a system of pipes buried in the shallow ground near the building.

In the future, civilization will be forced to research and develop alternative energy sources.

Possession of surplus energy is, of course, a requisite for any kind of civilization, for if man possesses merely the energy of his own muscles, he must expend all his strength - mental and physical - to obtain the bare necessities of life.

Saturday, December 27, 2014

The Latest Substitute For Fossils

The Latest Substitute For Fossils
To many of us, 'Bacteria' is synonymous with diseases. But how many of us know that without them our body cannot absorb certain essential nutrients? The bacterium under study here is E. coli ("Escherichia coli") commonly called the gut bacteria. The benefits of this particular bacterium is immense to the human body in that, it provides us not only with protection against other harmful bacterium strains but also helps us in our very sustenance.

Recently another benefit of this bacterium has been identified which leads to its categorization as a source of green energy. With our fossil resources dwindling, the need for alternate sources of energy is of high priority. While solar, wind, and hydroelectric energy are the most common choices, their use isn't as pervasive as it should be. Our stock of fossil fuels, which currently helps us meet majority of our energy demand, is finite. With the demand for energy growing day by day, scientists are researching and devising several techniques of producing energy in a way that doesn't harm or pollute the environment unlike fossils.

As the name suggests, fossils fuels are derived from plants and animal fossils that are millions of years old. Fossil sources are finite and the energy they produce is non-renewable. With the demand for energy increasing exponentially in the past few centuries, our resources are rapidly decreasing and is barely enough to sustain us through the next century. The use of fossils is immensely disadvantageous for both human beings and the environment. When extracted, fossils pose a severe damage to the landscape as they are to be dug out from underground wells. Pollution is another major disadvantage of fossil fuels. On burning, they give out harmful gases like nitrogen monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. These gases pollute the air that we breathe. They also cause acid rain which destructs buildings. Carbon dioxide is the primary greenhouse gas which is responsible for global warming, a looming threat to our very existence. As global warming has scaled new heights, it has complemented the depletion of ozone layer which protects us from the sun's ultra violet rays. This can lead to skin cancer and cataract in mammals.

Propane is an appealing choice for alternate energy source as it is a clean fuel and is highly in demand in the global market. Though it is produced as a by-product in the manufacture of LPG and in petroleum refining, these sources are finite and the amount produced is not commercially viable. In its current form, it takes up the bulk of LPG which has several applications ranging from central heating to conventional motor vehicles. Thus, alternate methods for production of propane has become the priority of the scientific community which recently made a breakthrough in this regard.

A team of scientists from Imperial College, London and the University of Turku in Finland, used E.coli to interrupt the biological process that converts fatty acids to cell membrane. The research used enzymes to channel the fatty acids along a different biological pathway. The bacteria subjected to this modification produced renewable, engine ready propane instead of cell membrane.

Albeit this research is in early stages, the fact that it produces propane that can be directly used as engine fuel without any processing makes it a discovery of enormous magnitude. This research provides a method of production of propane which was previously possible only through fossil reserves. Although the production has only been in small quantities now, scientists intend to expand its reaches and make it a sustainable energy source in future. Its use could initially complement and eventually, completely replace fossil fuels and petroleum. Propane is the obvious choice for scientists as this gas can easily escape the cell. This gas requires very little energy to transform itself into its liquid state which is easily transported, stored and used.

Using E.coli as the host, Scientists interrupted the biological process by which it converts fatty acids to cell membrane. When this reaction is thwarted at an early stage, an intermediate called butyric acid (a compound with a nasty smell) is formed. Butyric acid is the precursor of propane. A bacterial enzyme called CAR was used to convert butyric acid to butyraldehyde. When an enzyme called ADO, short for aldehyde-deformylating oxygenase is added to it, butyraldehyde is converted to propane. ADO is a commonly used enzyme for the naturally creating hydrocarbons. Previous attempts to use ADO enzyme have been futile as scientists were unable to harness the natural power of this enzyme to create hydrocarbons. However, scientists at the Imperial College have discovered that by stimulating ADO with electrons, they were able to enhance the catalytic capability of this enzyme substantially and ultimately produce propane.

The amount of propane produced currently by this methods is about one thousand times less than what is commercially required. Hence scientists are refining this method to make this promising discovery available to the world. This type of fuel has the potential to become one of the most pervasive and economical fuels available for the future. The method of production is not as elaborate as it is for petroleum products and it also is more economical than fossils. The most important aspect of using propane as a substitute for fossil fuel is that the efficacy of the engine remains the same as in the case of fossils. This is one distinct edge that propane has over other sources of energy like sun and wind which are sustainable but not as efficient as fossils and propane. This is one main reason people would readily adopt propane as a source of fuel in future when it is commercially produced.

As the global demand for energy is increasing day by day, energy technology has become a lucrative field with a lot of scope and more and more scientists are taking up to it. Currently algae can be used to make biodiesel, but it is not commercially viable as the harvesting and processing requires a lot of energy. Moreover, biodiesel cannot be used independently as a fuel, but only in association with petroleum products. Hence the only reduce fossil consumption but not completely eliminate its use. Propane on the other hand can be easily extracted from the natural process with minimal energy and is compatible with the existing infrastructure for easy use. They can completely replace the use of petroleum in automobiles. Typically, propane costs lesser than gasoline. It also enhances the engine efficiency. Propane is non-toxic, non-poisonous and insoluble in water. On burning, they give out lesser amounts of harmful gases and lesser greenhouse gases compared to fossils.

Fossils take millions of years to form. Since these resources are not recyclable, at this rate of usage, we are leaving absolutely nothing for our future generation. It is thus essential that we use them judiciously and prudently to make our lives easier and to prolong our lives. Once these resources are depleted, we cannot obtain any more coal, gas or oil. Hence, it is of at most importance that we depend on fossils as sparingly as possible and find alternative sources of energy to perform some of the functions that we currently satisfy using fossils.

The post The Latest Substitute for Fossils appeared first on Earth Untouched.

Friday, December 19, 2014

Uw P Receives 5 000 From Wind Energy Firm

Uw P Receives 5 000 From Wind Energy Firm
"An article from the Telegraph Herald (Dubuque, IA):"

The University of Wisconsin-Platteville's new sustainable and renewable energy systems major recently received 5,000 from Wind Capital Group, a wind-energy firm in Missouri, for its renewable-energy program to help promote and further the program.

Besides equipment and field trips, Wind Capital Group's commitment also will help fund student and faculty collaborative research and projects, scholarships within the program, and student and faculty conference trips.

Wind Capital has a number of projects, including a proposed wind farm in Smelser Township (and parts of two other Grant County townships), that the company is pursuing. The goal is to develop more wind-generated electricity in Wisconsin. The project is on hold pending state regulators' efforts to come up with statewide rules for wind farms.

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Which Power Companies Dud Solar Households

Which Power Companies Dud Solar Households
The Total Environment Centre has assembled data showing for the first time all the current government feed-in tariffs and solar export prices offered by electricity retailers in all states and territories for residential customers.

The table below sets out which states mandate a minimum price for power exports and the level specified. The best rate is in the Northern Territory at 27.13 CENTS PER KILOWATT-HOUR.

"Figure 1: Status of each Australian state and territory on minimum regulated export prices"

In terms of the extent to which power retailers compete to go beyond the levels specified above, the TEC's Mark Byrne noted: "The results are not pretty."

According to Byrne: "Even where competition does exist [between power retailers] most retailers only offer what state governments mandate them to offer. Where there is no minimum price for exported energy, only a handful of retailers offer more than a token amount."

Going above and beyond

The TEC highlighted only two power retailers which it felt were going the extra mile:

- CLICK ENERGY, a retailer in NSW, Victoria and Queensland which offers 10C PER KILOWATT-HOUR for solar power exports;

- HORIZON POWER"," the government power provider for regions of Western Australia that are not connected to the main southwest grid (the 'SWIS'). Horizon can offer prices for exported power in some of its service areas as high as 50C PER KILOWATT-HOUR. This is because Horizon is heavily dependent on use of relatively expensive fuel sources, particularly diesel, for providing power to its remote customers while at the same time charging them artificially low prices (subsidised by WA taxpayers). The company has gone to the effort of determining a rate for solar exports calibrated to the value of avoiding the use of expensive fuel. This is something I believe Ergon in Queensland is yet to do, and the Queensland Competition Commission did not require them to do when they were supposed to.

The table below provides a brief summary of offers from retailers which go beyond the mandated minimums in particular jurisdictions. In WA, Synergy is the only retailer for residential customers (because power prices are set at subsidised levels), so this is all that is on offer in that state. Also, in Victoria there is only one retailer that offers a rate above the mandated minimum - Click Energy. And Tasmania doesn't yet have retailer competition.

"Note: latest information provided by EnergyAustralia to Climate Spectator is that they offer a rate of 5.1 cents per kWh for exports in NSW and 6 cents per kWh for exports in Queensland."

So who are the retailers dudding solar owners?

The TEC names a number of power retailers as failing to go beyond the minimum level specified by the jurisdictional regulations but a number of these operate solely in Victoria and are, in fact, no worse than many of the retailers listed in the table above for that state. For example, among others Powershop is named by the TEC but they offer a rate no worse than anyone else in their sole state of Victoria, other than Click Energy. Indeed for those benefiting from the premium 60 cent feed-in tariff, Powershop at least offer 8 CENTS on top of that while Origin only pays 6 CENTS (The TEC data doesn't consider the legacy feed-in tariff arrangements).

If we exclude Victorian specialist retailers then we get a better picture of the retailers dudding solar owners where retail competition exists:

1. SIMPLY ENERGY pay NOTHING AT ALL for exported power by their customers in NSW and Queensland who were too late to get the government premium feed-in tariffs and only the BARE MINIMUM they're forced to pay in South Australia and Victoria. Their parent company - International Power/GDF Suez - has also been one of the most active corporates in lobbying against government policies that reduce carbon emissions and support solar and energy efficient products.

2. DODO POWER AND GAS are another solar-dudding retailer operating in Queensland, NSW, SA, ACT and Victoria, although they aren't noticeably active in undermining government policy to reduce carbon emissions - probably due to no ownership of power generation assets.

3. MOMENTUM pay NOTHING for NSW customers exporting power who aren't on premium feed-in tariffs and the BARE MINIMUM they are required to pay in SA and Victoria (they don't operate in Queensland). In addition, they act to undermine the voluntary GreenPower scheme and dupe customers by suggesting customers are buying 100 per cent renewable energy. This is purely an accounting sleight of hand because the renewable power they claim their customers are receiving is power that Hydro Tasmania would have generated in any case. By signing up as a Momentum customer on their '100 per cent Smile Power' product you are making precisely no difference to the amount of renewable energy generated in this country and no difference to greenhouse gas emissions. This is something the company belatedly acknowledges right at the bottom of its web page spruiking Smile Power as renewable energy. However, at least Hydro Tasmania has not been actively lobbying to undermine emission reduction policies. In fact, they have been supportive, for the most part, of the Renewable Energy Target and pricing carbon emissions, consistent with their commercial interests.

Original information source: http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/solar-energy/which-power-companies-dud-solar-households